Clearinghouse on Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention

powered by

Male circumcision and women

Integrating circumcision with broader HIV prevention

Men's sexuality

Male circumcision for HIV-positive men

Challenges around implementation

Advocacy perspectives and links

Advocacy in action

Publications database

Evidence-based materials on male circumcision, including scientific articles and books





Home > Advocacy > Male Circumcision and Women  


Male Circumcision and Women

Data from randomised clinical trials show that male circumcision can reduce men's risk of acquiring HIV from their female partners by about 60%. This intervention also has important implications for women. In the near term, much of this impact may relate to the ways that uptake of male circumcision for HIV prevention affects men’s sexual behaviours and assumptions about risk. There are currently no known direct benefits of male circumcision for women. The available data suggest that there are important indirect health benefits of male circumcision for women, in particular a reduced risk of exposure to HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. These indirect benefits would be longer term, emerging over time in communities where male circumcision is widely accepted.

It is critically important to develop male circumcision programmes that maximize benefits and minimize potential harms. Such potential harms include reductions in rates of condom use, increases in coercive sex, increased number of sex partners, and difficulties for women to negotiate safe sex or insist on condom use, particularly with a circumcised man. These harms may be most likely to emerge in the context of community or individual beliefs that male circumcision is completely protective against HIV, and eliminates the need for other risk reduction strategies. This is one reason why male circumcision for HIV prevention must incorporate ongoing communications targeting both women and men.

Advocates, civil society and other stakeholders are also interested in understanding and translating, at a community level, the potential indirect benefits to women of male circumcision. Scientific modelling studies to date suggest that expanded uptake of male circumcision for HIV prevention in specific epidemics will translate to an eventual reduction in HIV incidence and prevalence in women as they are themselves exposed to fewer HIV-infected men. Such a shift would happen over a matter of years.

Additional potential indirect benefits for women come from strategies that use male circumcision programmes for HIV prevention to reach young men and their partners with information and services on HIV risk reduction, gender equity, contraception, and shared sexual decision-making.

The limited data on male circumcision, HIV infection and the impact on women leave important unanswered questions. A trial in the Rakai district of Uganda of male circumcision in HIV-positive men was halted early and did not have sufficient power to demonstrate any direct effects in their HIV-negative women partners. This study also found a trend suggesting that discordant couples (HIV-positive man, HIV-negative woman) who resumed sex before the recommended six weeks of abstinence were more likely to transmit HIV to the female partner than those who delayed resumption of sex.

Due to the high incidence of HIV infection among women, particularly young women, it is important to assess potential risks and benefits of expansion of male circumcision programmes on women.

Some specific critical issues related to women include:

  • Messages around male circumcision, its risks and benefits; its place in the spectrum of proven prevention options; and its impact on women's ability to negotiate safer sex with stable and casual partners.
  • Impact of male circumcision on women's risk of acquiring HIV from circumcised, HIV-positive partners (who may or may not know their status and may or may not wait for full wound-healing before resuming sexual activity).
  • Impact on men's behaviour, such as changes in rates of high-risk sex, coercive sex, and condom use.
  • Research on men's and women's sexual satisfaction and pleasure following male circumcision.
  • Impact of new male circumcision programmes on national- and community-level priority-setting around HIV prevention, and on staff at health facilities that may be asked to add male circumcision to existing services.
  • Impact on women's involvement in pre-existing customs and or cultural rituals involving circumcision for neonates and/or for adolescent boys as a right of passage.


Feuer C. A Cautious Nod to the Cut ...Women Weigh in on Medical Male Circumcision (2010, PDF, 144 KB). Published in ALQ/Mujeres. AIDS Legal Network, July 2010.

Chatani M. Implications of Male Circumcision for Women: E-Discussion Forum Summaries and Recommendations (2009, PDF, 220 KB). Final Report, October 2009.

Male Circumcision: What Does it Mean for Women? (PDF, 293 KB). Global Campaign for Microbicides/PATH, 2009.

Meeting Report: Civil Society Dialogue on Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention: Implications for Women (PDF, 208 KB). 22-23 June 2008, Mombasa, Kenya. AVAC, 2008.

United Nations Information Package on Male Circumcision. Insert 5: Implications for Women (PDF, 836 KB). WHO/UNAIDS, 2008.

Women's Perspectives on the Rollout of Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention (PDF, 189 KB). AVAC/ATHENA, 2009.

Image Image Image
  • © Copyright
  • Terms of Use
  • Webmaster
  • Site Map
Web site developed by FHI 360
Contact Us About Us Site Map